![]() I'm not sure what's going on with the "Bare Bones" config but it wasn't liking the USB 2.0 HD. ![]() Results are presented as average write rate in MB/s, just because I felt like being contrary. unrar.exe shipped with WinRAR was used from the command line in a timing script. This is almost entirely filesystem I/O bound. Let's try some real world benchmarks.īeginning the round is a file operation, WinRAR extracting a 522 MB archive (651 MB uncompressed) to E:, which is an external USB2.0 hard disk. All configurations score identically except the "Bare Bones" which inexplicably scores lower in RAM Read - Note that such a score can be replicated on any of the other systems by increasing screen resolution and so meaning the IGP has to take more RAM bandwidth for display purposes. ![]() Obviously nothing is amiss other than the RS200M is perhaps the worst Pentium4 chipset ever made. Unless something is severely wrong, all scores should be more or less identical. Just to establish a hardware reference, some synthetic benchmarks in Everest. For what it's worth, it timed in at 9.4s when I modified the script to connect to IP. Either way, it wouldn't run the same script as the other three so it failed. The "Bare Bones" wouldn't connect to ".uk" but would connect to 192.168.0.2, the same system. How's about with wired networking then? Wireless is a bit slow after all It's rare I get more than 20Mbit, most likely because the AP sucks - but it is a constant in these tests. Better than the crap that Netgear want to install anyway but this is getting rather long for a parenthesis), so those failed this test. No wireless networking for "Tweaked" or "Bare Bones" users (seriously, why disable Wireless Zero Config now it actually, y'know, works? I could understand it in RTM or SP1 where it universally sucked but since SP2 it's worked more or less pretty well. The FTP server is Serv-U (I know, I know, but WarD was being a bitch.) Hatserver is a 2GB RAM, 2.8GHz dual core Opteron with an Nvidia nForce3 gigabit ethernet running to an unmanaged Netgear switch, off which hangs the wireless AP. This uses ftp.exe and times how long it takes. The test machine is .uk) a 102MB file and timing it with the script. This involves downloading from an FTP server hosted on hatserver (.uk internally, externally. Seriously MS, how the fuck did that happen?Īlright, let's see how well our network works. How much commit charge is the system servicing after boot? This is the "PF usage" in Task Manager, possibly the stupidest mislabeled metric in the entire OS. The next is the simplest (and possibly most meaningless) you're ever going to see. XP Pro OOTB XP Pro BV "Safe" XP Pro BV "Tweaked" XP Pro BV "Bare Bones" My stopwatch would be accurate to perhaps half a second, but all times were rounded to the nearest second. I ran this five times on each configuration, discarded the two lowest as being bullshit and averaged the three highest. ![]() Time taken from the BIOS beep to a wav file playing on startup to go ding, as good an indication of boot time as any other method I could figure out. Then, against every morsel of good sense in my body, I went here: It was from my XP SP3 image current with hotfixes to about September.Īfter installing drivers, I did a few reboot cycles and launched every app I'd be benchmarking with to make sure XP's prefetcher was populated. So I quickly imaged my current install on it, via a 100Mbit cable, to network store and reinstalled Windows XP. (Interestingly, many screenshots in MSDN blogs for Windows Vista are taken on this platform - I wouldn't like to run Vista on it, that's for sure) The test system is a Hewlett Packard ze5600 laptop. Or, as you're about to see, how much difference such tweaks can't make. The purpose behind all this rubbish was to give me something to pass time on a boring Friday afternoon to show how much a difference 'tweaking' services can make to startup, app load and performance of a Windows XP SP3 system. DriverGuru recently dropped me a PM asking if I had a link to it and I had to admit I had no clue. I did one of these a while ago, but I have no idea where the thread went.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |